|
Prairie
Creek reply to Larry Vernon
Reply to Mr. Larry Vernon’s “Letter to
the Editor”
Mr. Vernon suggested
getting the facts. The facts are:
There was no electrical power to the
pumps at the pump station during that flood in the
1980’s – and it makes no difference
what kind of monitors are in place, if there is a
power failure the pumps do not work. How could the
pumps work with no electrical power? Miles
Johnson, lake manager at the Russellville project
office with the Corps of Engineers stated that
there was a power outage with high water during
that flood of the 1980’s. The bridges had nothing
to do with there being no electrical power to the
pumps and they were idle – simply put I have
offered the facts. However, I do agree with you
that the creek and bridges need to be kept clean.
Your contingency plan failed. If the
people with the U. S. Corps of Engineers had had
their homes flooded as many in Russellville did,
and had to repair them at their own expense I am
sure they would have realized the contingency plan
was a failure. Their contingency plan is to bring
in large generators in a worst-case scenario –
this means after we have had a flood. I don’t want
to wait until Entergy can determine how long it
will take to repair the electrical outage and then
negotiate with other U. S. Corps groups to
determine if a generator is needed, then wait
until one is moved in from Little Rock, maybe
Memphis, or maybe even Oklahoma City, and all the
while Russellville is flooding.
At the May
Planning Commission meeting there were people
present that used boats to help others out of
their businesses and homes during that flood of
the 1980’s. Ask them if the contingency plan
worked.
One incident during that flood
involved a young man that had a V.W. mud buggy. He
was driving on bolder and having a fun time
splashing water high in the air and breaking
windows in businesses. A local business owner
(whom we all knew) got his pistol from under his
counter and stopped the kid, pointed his pistol at
him and said, “If you come through here again and
break another window I will use this on you.” We
all have a built in defense system to protect the
things we have worked so hard for and we don’t
need floods to start that kind of problem.
Imagine with me what it would be like with
a rain of 2 inches per hour at 2:00 A. M. The
power fails and someone has to get permission, and
then locate and get a generator from where ever
they are stored, one that possibly has not been
started in months or years, and with old and stale
fuel from storage – and then we have to find a
specialist that can come in to connect everything
and get the generators working properly – with the
way our government operates this might take days.
Mr. Johnson indicated that Entergy brought
in a second line – obviously someone recognized
there is a problem. While I recognize that the
second line is helpful I can’t help but believe
that with a major storm or accident causing a
major power failure two lines would be no better
than one line.
This is not a far-fetched
ideal – power failures and floods are happening
somewhere around this nation on a regular basis.
I am simply asking the U. S. Corps of
Engineers to install three more pumps and have in
place an electrical back up system (generator)
that will kick in as soon as a power failure would
occur – without having to get someone out in a
storm that doesn’t want to leave his home or
family at such a time as that and go through the
process of getting power re-established. I had a
friend with a couple of chicken houses during the
major ice storm and power failure in 1999. Because
of that power outage he lost about seven thousand
chickens. My friend installed a computer
controlled fully automatic diesel powered
generator to supply power (and heat) to his
chicken houses to prevent this from happening
again. My friend tests that back-up system weekly.
Surely the U. S. Corps of Engineers can recognize
that the health and safety of 28,000 residents of
Russellville are as important as those seven
thousand chickens.
One more thing: Our
city should clean out Prairie Creek to insure
proper water movement during a flood. The cost
could be minimal by getting the local National
Guard units to assist in this as part of their
training. While doing this we could develop a plan
to turn Prairie Creek into an asset and not a
liability – maybe a river walk along side it from
downtown to Bona Dea Trail. That would create one
more attraction to our fine city and be profitable
and beautiful to us all.
David Lee
| |
| | |